Interacting….

And now…. these important messages from… me.

Since this is a free teaching blog, I feel justified in occasionally pointing out how you can hire me. That’s the price you pay (that, and tell all your friends to follow this blog too).

So. If you want to interact with me to learn in person, or to hire me to shoot, here’s how you can do it.

Learning:

  • Do private coaching with me. September and October dates available.
  • If you are in the Toronto area, come join me at The Distillery, where I am doing my exhibit. This week only: two hours coaching right there in The Distillery  for a reduced price of $150 (normally $190).
  • If you are in The Netherlands, come see me at my seminar there on September 1st – sign up now, there is space!
  • Come to the Niagara School of Imaging starting Sunday – there is still space.
  • Join me at my series of Seminars at Vistek Mississauga: Sep/Oct/Nov dates about to be published soon.
  • Sign up at Sheridan College for one of my 12-week courses there.

Book:

  • Buy my book – “Camera Cookbook” eBook will be out very soon, final edit is now being done. It will be for sale right here.

Shooting:

  • Hire me to shoot your engagement, family shoots, or wedding – see www.tolivetolove.com. Because Kristof B and I just set up this endeavour, we have dates available even in the next few months!
  • Hire me to do headshots, events, or corporate photography: see www.mvwphoto.com
  • You can buy my artwork. At my current exhibit until early September – see www.michaelsmuse.com – or direct from me, see here.

Now copy all that, and continue reading the blog. You have read older posts as well, yes? It’s all very useful!

And now, back to regular programming!

Michael


Wedding Season!

An exciting new initiative: Kristof Borkowski and I are now shooting weddings, engagements, etc as a team. We shoot locally in Ontario, but also do destination weddings all over the world: our all-new web site, www.tolivetolove.com, explains more.

Lucy and Matt at their recent wedding (photo by www.tolovetolive.com)

One exciting part is that since this initiative is new, unlike older businesses, we have openings even this summer.  Give us a call or drop us a line if you are interested in great photography of your special day or event.

And now what you are here for… a few Wedding Photo Tips:

  • When shooting a wedding, get a detailed list of required shots well in advance from the bride and groom.
  • Go over this list in detail until it is complete. That way, there will be no surprises!
  • Print the list!
  • Make sure you have the name and cell number etc of someone who can help you get all the people in the required shots together on the day. They know who Uncle Frank is; you don’t!
  • Use a camera with two memory cards, and write e4ach image to both. Cards fail, and precious moments never appear again – they happen once, and that is it.
  • Use fast lenses. A minimum of f/2.8 is required (even then you will shoot at 1600 ISO often!); prime f/1.4 lenses can often be even better.
  • Carry twice the number of flashes and cameras that you need. Things break!
  • Carry twice the batteries that you need – and then double this number again.
  • Change batteries for every segment of the shoot.

Use those and you’re set to go. (But… one piece of advice: do not shoot a wedding as the only shooter if you have no prior experience: shoot with a pro as an assistant, and then as a second shooter, a few times until you know the drill!)

 

The Beer-Quay?

At the risk of sounding defensive, let me emphasize to all my students:

Your photography is valuable – do not give it away.

Photography is at least as valuable as, say, dental hygiene, or plumbing, or sewers, or garbage collection. Yet people will pay for the latter, and pay well, and often not for the former.

Case in point. An art festival contacted me a few days ago: they wanted to use my photo of Jazz great Peter Appleyard, which they described as a “stunning photo”:

Peter Appleyard. Photo © Michael Willems, All Rights Reserved

Note that this is a significant art festival, which:

  • Charges up to $50 for admission per guest, for each event. Plus HST.
  • Is sponsored by the Ontario Arts Council, the Ontario Arts Foundation, the Canada Council for the Arts, and  the Canadian Heritage ministry.
  • Is sponsored by The Cooperators and various other commercial organizations.
  • Undoubtedly pays for its venues, food, drink, permits,
  • Undoubtedly pays its performers.
  • Undoubtedly pays its taxes, office costs, hydro, water, sewerage.
  • Most certainly pays its printer for the brochure I was going to be used in.

And yet for the photo there was no remaining budget.

I would have let it go for a very small fee (my way of subsidizing the arts), but “”free” is a no-go. You see, I too am expected to pay the bills.

Why is this happening? I see a few reasons.

  • “Uncle Fred has a Digital Rebel”. This makes the perceived value of photography zero, even though there’s no way Uncle Fred can produce a photo like the above.
  • New photographers fall into the trap of “doing it for credit”. Don’t do this, new photographers, if you ever want to do it for a living! Instead, calculate the hours you really spend on a shoot (including talking about it, getting there, shooting, waiting, and post-editing), and multiply that by the wage you want to make (hint: you are worth at least what a dental hygienist or a plumber are worth!).

It is what it is – the Dutch have an expression that translates as “you can’t fight the beer quay” – i.e. if people want beer delivered, it WILL happen. Calligraphy went away, and if quality photography is no longer wanted by society, so be it. We’ll all just shoot weddings. Although – even those: I have recently been asked to shoot several weddings for “a few hundred dollars each”. Which is at least 20 times below my normal fee.

There will of course always be quality photography, Ads in magazines, art shows (like mine coming up: Never Not Naked – Natural Nudes) and more will always need competent artists. But it will be a market where 1% of photographers get paid, and the rest do it “for credit”.

So – a parting thought: be part of the 1% and come to me to learn how to really do it!

 

Flash Ethics

I bumped into another pro yesterday at The Distillery. She was about to teach a workshop and thought I had come to attend. Which I had not.

Turns out this photographer does photojournalistic weddings and family shoots, and never uses flash, and, astonishingly to me, for the following reason: because she has “ethical problems shooting flash”. I think was unable to convince her to even take a look at speedlighter: flash was a no-go area for her.

Ethical? Artistic I can understand, but in my experience, pros who do not use flash have several reasons:

  1. They do not really know how to, especially TTL flash with all its limitations and complexities. This is the vast majority of non-flash users.
  2. They have genuine (and in my view, misguided) ethical problems.
  3. They have reason (1) but say it’s (2).

Category 2 is a minority, and in my opinion, a misguided one!

As a newspaper shooter, I could never alter a picture: cropping, white balance and exposure is all, and any other alteration would ensure I would never work in press photography again. You need to trust the photos you see in the paper. So I get ethics! But adding light has been allowed for many, many years. What are you supposed to do when there’s not enough light?

I shoot, and teach shooting, with flash. Either:

  1. On its own (in a studio); or in a mixed environment, namely:
  2. Mixed with bright outside light, when you need to kill that light
  3. Or with dim indoors light where you have to boost that light.

The main point is not not the adding light – the main point is the creative options that this opens. By saying “I only shoot with flash” you are denying yourself a great number of opportunities. Like this, taken a few hours ago at Lake Ontario in Oakville:

I used an off-camera flash. Am I ethically sinning by adding light and making this a nice picture? No way. As for events: bounce behind you and use the flash as additional light. You are not committing ethical breaches by doing this!

So go ahead, learn flash, and use it for both technical (adding light) and artistic purposes. Have fun!

 

No Show?

I was asked the other day while shooting: why do I not like to show clients my shots on the camera while I am shooting?

  • The display is not very good, on some of my pro cameras. That leads to bad previews.
  • Showing distracts me from shooting and uses up my battery.
  • The images may need cropping or adjusting, especially when shooting TTL flash.
  • I may want to have time to choose the one out of three identical portrats that I shoot – the one without the double chins.
  • Some images should never be seen (eg images of people eating).
  • No image looks great when one inch in size.

That is why I prefer to look at my images myself before showing – that way you get to see only excellence. Cool?

 

Dear Readers: you will forgive a little promotion in my second post today. Because it is promotion that can help you.

  • Brought on by our lovely weather the last week or so, I have a “Suspicion of Summer” special on for June. For June only, private coaching is available at my Oakville location for $75 per hour rather than the usual $95 per hour. Book soon, since availability is limited to the 24 hours each day has, and they do tend to all fill up. This is made-to-measure individual training, but see http://www.cameratraining.ca/ for some possible subjects.
  • There is still space on the The Art of Shooting Nudes workshop: see http://www.cameratraining.ca/Nudes.html (NSFW).

Whatever you shoot: in just a few hours I can make you a much better photographer.

  • My coaching and teaching are professional and made-to-measure to your needs.
  • All photos I show you are mine, so I can teach you how to take similar photos.
  • I am independent: I do not sell hardware, so what I think you need is what you need.
  • Whether it is weekends, week days or evenings, I teach exactly when it suits you.
  • You get to be hands-on – not just sit and listen.

Take advantage of the special to kick-start your photography today and I promise, you will be delighted. If you like this teaching blog, you will love my coaching and teaching.

Michael

 

Photography is Art, but not for Everyone

Odd, this. I have just been fired as an instructor by Henry’s School of Imaging!

Yup – fired! David Morrow, the head of the School of Imaging (dmorrow@henrys.com) writes:

“This week we received a letter from a Henry’s customer with an [sic] printed photo of you naked from your Tumblr site. This customer recently attended an SOI course taught by you and has promised to never shop at Henry’s again. I am grateful to this customer for taking the time to inform us, rather than just leaving silently.  This loss of a Henry’s customer is a direct result of your personal promotion of your speedlighter.ca site while teaching for Henry’s.”

This is regrettable, and surprising.

For the record, I do not promote competing courses at Henry’s, and I have met all the School’s requirements, including ones that I think unjust, like removing the link to www.cameratraining.ca from this site (that link comes back now). Speedlighter, if clients know about it, is for learning, not for promotion.

Good relationships are give and take. It seems to me that I have given Henrys and the School of Imaging much, much more than I have taken, but I wish them well.

I shall now concentrate on my independent courses: vendor- and sales-independent and up-to-date courses and coaching that teach you all about photography and especially creative light and flash.

Including nudes, if you are so inclined: the preposterous thing is that this was brought about by a client who “will never shop at Henry’s again” because they have seen a picture of me, nude. Really? This is, what, 1850? Almost all artists, including most photographers, do nudes and Henry’s, who cater to photographers, should understand this better than anyone else. Will this client never go to Italy again after seeing Michelangelo’s David?

Regrettable and surprising.

Meanwhile, the good news: You can learn from me..

  1. In my private courses (see http://www.cameratraining.ca)
  2. At Sheridan College’s Continuing Education, where I teach several courses I wrote.
  3. At the Niagara School in August, for a week-long course.
  4. In my article in every second issue of Photo Life magazine.
  5. At tours and private teaching events
  6. And of course here on www.speedlighter.ca!

Photography is art and craft, a mix you can all learn to find your way in, and I am here to help.

 

Weddings

Apart from being busy driving (I picked up my son in Montreal yesterday: 1300km, 13 hours in the car, in one day).

But I have also shot a few weddings in the last days. And when I say “I” I mean “we”: look at this image: three photographers plus myself shooting the bride arriving at the reception:

That is Kristof, who shot the wedding with me, and our assistants Ola and Merav.

To do a wedding justice, you need several shooters:

  • You get the moments.
  • You get several points of view.
  • You have “equipment and CF card insurance”
  • You have “personal mishap insurance”
  • You avoid losing time due to constant lens changes.

A wedding is our mark in history, and it is worth doing well. If you are tempted to shoot one for a friend: engage a pro, or at least engage other shooters also.

TIP: wedding photography is in part fashion photography. Join Kristof and myself for a workshop on 19 May: http://cameratraining.ca/Fashion.html – you only have three days left to sign up! (The same urgency applies to the Africa workshop: click here)

 

Pricing Question

A reader today asked me this:

I’ve been keeping up with your blog from time to time and have really found some great tips and information. I was wondering if you have any advice on pricing for a photo session. A friend of a friend is interested in having a few headshots of him taken for his business to put on his website, and I am a little unsure as to how to go about pricing it. I figure that as a student who is still learning I should offer a lower price, and since the nature of the session is of shorter length and for one image on a website to make it not too pricey as well. Is $50 reasonable for a one or so hour shoot and a couple of digital shots? I do not want to underprice myself but I also do not want to overprice.

Good question.

I would say that you should be careful before you underprice, and I believe $50 is seriously underpricing, since:

  • When you actually add the hours you’ll spend on it, there’s rather a lot of them.
  • The work is the work. If your work is good, it is worth the price.

Here’s what I suggest:

  1. Check mvwphoto.com for commercial prices.
  2. Discount as much as you like but I’d suggest no less than $100. It’s a company web site and when you look at commercial prices, these are much higher to reflect all the actual work and expertise you put into a shoot.
  3. Always quote full price, eg $400, and THEN subtract the discount. So your customer can see the full value of your work.
  4. You are learning. But in the end, it’s the result that counts. So as a new Photog, you give a guarantee: he pays only if he likes. After all if your work is good for him, it’s as good as anyone else’s!

Does this make sense? Photography is a great combination of business, art and craft, and if you do it sustainably it will not make you rich, but it will certainly make you and your clients happy!

 

Banhammered

From where I stand, Facebook has the morality, or the sad excuse thereof, of a Taliban mullah. I have now been banned for three days for “abusing facebook features” for posting an entirely innocent image, much tamer than many I have seen.

It was the following, funny in my opinion, set-up shot, made in honour of another photographer who shot the same model in a similar shot some years ago:

Um, and now, it appears, I am “abusing features”?

It is hard to describe the contempt I feel for these morons.

Now, when I log in, I see this:

The only section in there that seems even remotely to offer a reason for the ban is this:

That to me is not nudity – nothing showing. It is definitely not not pornography; it is also certainly not sexual, let alone “inappropriately sexual”. if they think this is sexual, they are sick.

The dictionary I just consulted says that nudity means the state of being nude, which they say means this:

“nude  (njuːd)  — adj 1. completely unclothed; undressed 2. having no covering; bare; exposed”.

That does not apply here, so I must conclude that Facebook has redefined nudity as “anything remotely hinting that there may be nudity somewhere”. The Taliban, in other words.

So am I being ungrateful to Facebook? They are providing a free service, after all?

No way.

  • First, I am not getting a free product: I *am* the product. Facebook is worth billions because there are millions of advertising-consumers like me earning them money.
  • Second, Facebook has a monopoly on social interaction. The only way I can find and stay in touch with people from my past, customers from my present and prospects for the future, is Facebook.  Google+ has almost none of the people I am interested in on it. I do much business via Facebook. There is no alternative.

“Noblesse oblige”. If you are a monopoly, you have to be careful not to abuse that. You will be held to stricter standards. Facebook will find, one day, that its value is limited by its behaviour.

In the mean time, let me express how sorry I am for my American friends who have to live in a land ruled in part by their equivalent of the Taliban.

And censorship does not work. You can now go look at many more images – and these are NSFW, and do contain nudity – on my Tumblr page, here. Tumblr is not ruled by Taliban.

POST EDIT: Thanks to all my photographer friends from SPS, who have been universally supportive (and annoyed at FB’s prudishness).