My 7D..

…just hung up again. Again, not long after live view. No response even to on-off switch: nothing happens and top LCD remains lit. And again, it needed the battery removed to start responding to anything. Worrying, and as a wedding shooter, this would stop me (a hang could theoretically very easily corrupt the disk).

Canon 7D impressions

Some more “first impressions” after I have been using my Canon 7D for a few days. This is more a list of impressions, not a full review – but they are practical impressions. Here it is (and click for larger):

MVWS9996

And the back:

MVWS0005

As a teacher of photography and cameras, I am well familiar with all Canon cameras, so the first thing I look for is differences. And I see those in droves. Both compared to my 1D and 1Ds, and compared to other small-frame cameras and the 5D.

  • It feels great. Not only is it small and light (at least compared to my 1Ds MkIII and 1D MkIII), but it is also very nice to handle.
  • The layout has been changed a bit. the power switch, for instance, is now on the left.
  • The 7D has video. Very nice video: high-def, including 24 and 29.97 fps.
  • The all-new focus system is very good. Many more focus points (19 in all). Canon has added new focus modes: “Spot focus” (a smaller single focus spot), “zone focus” (where the camera chooses, but in one zone only) and “adjacent points” like on the 1D/1dDs, except it is always all points around the chosen point).
  • Weather sealing has been added.
  • The large display is very good. This not-unimportant innovation means you no longer worry unnecessarily about soft focus.
  • White balance in low light and Tungsten light is better than on previous Canon cameras.
  • A new “M.Fn” button has been added. This is needed to switch focus modes and it is used for various other functions.
  • A new “Q” button has been added: a “Quick settings” back of the LCD menu, á la Nikon’s. This can be quite convenient.
  • Many more ways to assign functions to the various buttons (including the “direct print” button which has never been used by anyone, ever, and which is now a “quickly add a RAW or JPG” button). This is pretty huge.
  • A new separate button for Live View and Video – convenient.
  • Exposure compensation goes farther (+/1 three stops are displayed; you can go farther).
  • Canon also added an electronic level; useful for landscape .JPG photographers (assuming they exist). You can choose to activate it with the “info” button, or you can see it in the viewfinder – using the focus points.
  • The viewfinder is 100% and very bright for a crop viewfinder. It has an all-new built-in transmissive LCD that shows focus points and grids (but inexplicably, does not have an option for a “rule of thirds” grid in viewfinder mode: an obvious mode I would have thought).
  • Peripheral illumination correction has been added, like in the 5D MkII.
  • Focus can be displayed in AI servo.
  • Batteries can be registered, so you remember when you bought which one.
  • The most important innovation: the pop-up flash can now be used to drive other (580 and 430) speedlites. No longer do you need a separate 580EX flash on the camera to do this. Lighten and you save$500. And more ways have been added to set rations: not just A:B and flash compensation – but now you also have the option to set built-in vs external ratio and separate flash compensation settings for popup and external. This is fantastic innovation and makes this camera an option for a pro like me.

The list of innovations is enormous. And yet the camera feels immediately familiar, only in a better way. Well done, Canon. Great news.

So is it perfect?

  • The 7D is more noisy than the 1Ds – it has a smaller sensor, after all – but not by much (see an earlier post on this blog). In practical applications this will not be noticed much.
  • It is a crop camera. That is no doubt why it is cheap. (if $2,000 can be called “cheap”).
  • Live View is more useful than before – but “live” focus is painfully slow.
  • Video is better than before too, but is it really practical? The need to use manual focus and manual exposure (which is at least possible) limit the utility. Still – I will definitely use it.
  • The camera has hung up a few times on me – locked up totally, something my 1D, 1Ds, 5D and others never did. It has only happened a few times.. but shows less than perfect software QA.
  • The auto lighting optimizer and highlight priority modes conflict; you have to use one or the other. And when you add “safety shift” and auto ISO, things get very complicated. Engineering degree, anyone?
  • Settings are missing for marketing reasons. Why not give me the ability to limit auto ISO? Nikon does it even on cheapish cameras. When reviewing, why not zoom in to the selected focus point? Why not give me the ability to store and retrieve standard settings (not using the “custom setting” modes)? Come on, Canon: you think I don’t know what you are doing? Instead of crippling cheaper cameras, how about enhancing the costlier ones?
  • Canon DPP is great, but incredibly, still lacks a function to rotate an arbitrary mount, and a “resize then sharpen” option. This makes it important that it should be supported in Adobe Lightroom – and it isn’t. Yet. Until Adobe gets around to it. Shame on Canon for not ensuring this happens right away, if they aim at pros!
  • Focus is better. Still, especially in low light the camera occasionally misses focus badly – the Canon problem of the last few years. I can live with it, but would love to see even more improvements.

Here’s another high ISO hand-held happy snap:

IMG_0975

For now, this camera is meeting my requirements as a working pro very well; when I carry two cameras, from now on that will not be the 1Ds MkIII and the 1D MkIII, but rather one of those (the 1Ds3, most likely, since it is full-frame) and the 7D. I am very happy so far.

More news from the field soon!

More 7D vs 1Ds MkIII comparison.

OK, so now let’s try a slightly more scientific test for the pixelpeepers among us here. Here’s my Canon 7D.

MVWS9935

For tonight’s second short test, I just used the Canon 24-70 f/2.8L zoom lens. Set to 24mm on the 7D, and to 38mm on the 1Ds MkIII, to give the same field of view.

I fired an umbrella-mounted studio strobe through pocketwizards, with the cameras set to:

  • manual
  • 1/125th second
  • f/8
  • 100 ISO.

Because of the varying zoom setting, which gives the same field of view, the two are still inevtably different – but being the same lens, and at f/8, this difference matters little. Essentially, this is a fair test.

We get, in both cases, a nice sharp image like this out of Canon DPP (that is all I used, and with no alterations at all):

IMG_1148-full

Great picture on both cameras.

And that is where the story might stop. But because I am curious – how good is the 7D image compared to the 1Ds MkIII’s – I now crop to a 1200 x 800 pixel wide area in both cases. Here they are at full size (and you can click to see these crops unaltered, at their actual size):

7D:

IMG_1148

And 1Ds MkIII:

MVWS9916

When you click and compare both of these unaltered images, it shows how good the 7D is for a crop sensor body.

The white balance difference is hardly noticeable when properly exposed like this.

There is clearly a tiny bit more noise in the 7D image. But it is tiny, and the 7D has better blacks. The difference is so small that at this low ISO and with this good light, no real difference should be seen in practice. And with the 7D’s many other advantages, that is a great thing. This camera will remain at my side in shoots.

Another 7D post

Canon 7D versus 1Ds Mark 3.

I was in a hurry so this test is by no means complete, and it is not quite apples versus apples. That said, I just shot a light in my studio with the 1Ds MkIII and with the 7D. Same lens length, effectively:

7D setup:

  • 35mm f/1.4L lens
  • 3200 ISO, f/5.6, 1/50th sec
  • AWB, standard camera NR settings

1Ds MkIII setup:

  • 24-70 f/2.8L lens set to 46mm
  • 1600 ISO, f/4, 1/50th sec
  • AWB, standard camera NR settings

In both cases I took the image into Canon DPP and did not adjustments at all. I saved as 1200 pixels long, and I saved it as an original size crop at 100% JPG quality.

Large shots, 7D first:

7D-1200

1DS3-1200

Now for the real size detail, 7D first – click on each to see them at original size:

7D-1200-Crop

1DS3-crop

The first thing you see is that the white balance is off on the 1Ds MkIII, and is much better on the 7D.

Also, the 7D looks sharper. More noise – it is 3200 ISO vs 1600 ISO on the 1Ds – but it is noticeably sharper.

The other thing to note is that on the 1Ds, I needed several shots to get the camera to focus on the “Opus” name. Several were eway off. The 7D is behving more consistently.

Note also that it is easy to be fooled: on the display, the 1D image looks soft at all times, while the 7D image looks crisp, sharp, wonderful. But that is partly due to the display.

Next week I will do some proper controlled tests. But this already shows me they are at te very least comparable.

7D progress

In the next week or so, I’ll do more of a review of the 7D. Still very happy with it: this camera is a major update to the GUI and is a lot of fun and focuses better than my 1Ds3 and 1D3. Video is fun too, although I am not sure I can spare another 5 Terabytes and 12 hours a day doing video post. Plus, taking video is nice but even a short video will be many gigabytes. So it’s back to driving around: no Internet can handle that yet.

I do wish they had not crippled the camera by design, by the way. Auto ISO, for instance, is a great feature. But why set automatically between 100 and 3200 ISO? Why not let me limit it, say to 800 or 1600 ISO? No doubt they intend that to be available only on the 1Ds Mk4. It would cost nothing to add it. Are we being manipulated for marketing purposes?

3200 ISO JPG

People talk about the 7D’s noise, I hear. Well, I saw that too – my first impression was, it seems noisy in Lightroom. On the other hand:

  • That is without a proper Lightroom import filter.
  • The 7D has auto-ISO and my 1Dx bodies do not, so of course I am shooting at higher ISOs than I am used to.

And look how a 3200 ISO JPG looks:

IMG_0838

Real size sample:

IMG_0838-2

Well, real sized when you click on it.

Noisy? I think that is great. Remember, this is full sized detail; shot at 3200 ISO, and taken from a JPG! A few years ago, 800 ISO would have been unacceptably noisy.

My new Canon 7D

…just locked up. Out of nowhere. I was not even doing anything.  Even turning it off did not do anything – I had to remove the battery.

I’m not concluding anything from this, but have to wonder: if this that famous Canon QC again? I shall await the software update…. months from now, presumably.

7D – post two

Okay… so I own a brick, until Adobe or Canon start waking up and fixing the fact that Lightroom, my core tool, cannot yet properly read 7D images. They come up noisy and with awful colour, using a “beta” camera profile and no way to select another. Adobe say they “hope” to get a fix for this into the next update (when? They say they are a long way off). See here.

MVWS9808

Also, I just figured out that movies are ignored by Lightroom. Fair enough but since I use Lightroom to copy stuff off my memory card, which is then ejected and formatted (by me), that ignoring is not clever better would be to copy them for me to some location.

Now I lost the family videos I made yesterday. That is regrettable. Now I need to, from now on, load CF cards into two different apps. Not very desirable – Lightroom lives by the fact it’s the one tool I use for my entire practice, and it is failing here on two counts.

7D

I went down to my local Henry’s store in Oakville yesterday (OK, I was teaching there) and bought a new Canon 7D.

This adds to my 1D MkIII and 1Ds Mk III. While it is not full frame, it does have an all-new focus system and it can drive speedlites from its pop-up flash. And it does high-def 29.97/25/24fps video. Reasons enough to add one!

It is now sitting next to me in Waterloo, Ontario with a 35mm f/1.4L lens on it – that makes it a fifty,of course, since 35 x 1.6 = 50, and you know how I feel about the “nifty fifty” (search for it on this blog if you don’t yet).

So far the 7D is looking good: I shall do a full review in the next few weeks.